Well, whaddya know. No sooner did we lavish praise upon the SF County Transportation Authority than Nat Ford, head of Muni, decided that he might be interested in committing a hostile takeover of the SFCTA... thereby making the TA as flawless as Muni. Good idea! If our
agency was melting down, and there was another one making us look bad,
we might want to buy it and run it into the ground, too! (That's why
we're always wishing we could seize control of SF Metblogs.)
The TA, if you're unfamiliar,
was created a couple of years ago by a voter mandate. Muni was in awful
shape at that time (unimaginable, we know), and an voters needed an
alternative agency that could actually get work done. And it worked --
the SFCTA has reduced congestion, fixed up 19th and Geary and Octavia, spruced up transit in neighborhoods like Little Saigon, and they're working on converting Caltrain from diesel to electric. In contrast, during that time Muni was busy being mean to a lady in a wheelchair.
If Muni took over the TA, it wouldn't make your bus run on time, or
put up more NextMuni signs, or train bus drivers to be more friendly,
or cut waste, or consolidate redundant lines like the parallel 31, 5,
and 21. It would, however, mean that Gavin would have a bigger
piggybank to dip into when he feels like strangling transit.
So, why does the TA work so well, and the MTA (that's Muni + some
other street-related agencies) move so sluggishly? Well, our guess is
that it's because the TA only takes on projects that it can afford;
while the MTA is so ambitious, so underfunded, spread so thin, and so
chronically strapped for cash and talent that it can barely stay in
business. (The T-Third and Central Subway aren't going to help.) If Nat
really wants to make Muni run well, he'll need to stop eying other
agencies' money, and make the tough decision to cut costs -- and by
cutting costs, we mean start eliminating services. That won't make him
popular; but it'll make Muni work.